The Death of Churchianity



On Vince Antonucci’s blog, he posted the following scenario (which comes from Bob’s Robert’s book, The Multiplying Church).

Let’s start a thousand churches over the next ten years, each one running a minimum of two thousand members, and in just ten years we will turn America upside down with the gospel! That would work, right? Wrong – that scenario just happened over the past ten years, and there are fewer people in church today than ever before. How can that be? How could we have spent billions to start two thousand megachurches and yet have fewer people in church and a society that largely feels the church is antagonistic?

The answer which I and other commenters suggested is that most of the people who start to go to those new churches are not new Christians, but people who were already Christians and who transferred to the new and exciting church. Most of the church plants grew by transfer growth, not church growth. One of those who commented pointed out the supporting statistic that every year about 4,000 churches close their doors… forever (Does anybody know if this worldwide, or just in the States?).

Then today, I was reading an article called “Change-Seekers” in World Magazine, which summarized the major study of the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life (available here). The study revealed that currently only 51% of Americans are “Protestant,” down from 60-65% in the 1970s. The only “religious group” actually increasing in numbers are those who identify themselves as “non-religious.” They comprise 16% of America, and have nearly doubled in number since the 1980s. Then the author of the article says this:

Despite the church growth movement and the proliferation of megachurches, evangelical Christianity is losing ground. Growing churches often have high turnover. [Are they going to other new churches with a better show?] The issue is not how to gain new members but how to keep the ones churches already have.

After reading this, I decided to check how Bob Roberts answered his own question. I have The Multiplying Church and so picked it up, and found the quote Vince Antonucci referred to. Then I skimmed several key sections of the book, and it seems Bob Roberts is saying that the problem our churches face is that we are not seeing true life transformation in those who attend our churches.

I found this insightful, especially since on Friday, I read a book by Neil Cole called Cultivating a Life for God in which he reveals a way of discipling people which has resulted in amazing life transformation in the people that have done it worldwide. But the beauty of what he proposes is that this life transformation does not depend on the systems and structures that have come to be known as “church.” Instead, his proposal is simple, free, and easily reproducible. I just started reading his newest book, Search & Rescue, which appears to be an updated remix of Cultivating a Life for God.

It is my opinion that the way we do “church” today is more often than not a hindrance to the spread of the gospel and the making of disciples. The death of churchianity is coming, and while it saddens me when churches close, I am also excited because I believe that a new movement of God is coming upon His people whereby we throw off the things that hinder what He is doing in our lives, communities, and countries, and embrace a new (actually old) way of being the church.

This new/old way will not need millions of dollars to sustain itself. It will live out the gospel among the people of this world by serving, living, and loving them, rather than just teaching facts. It will transform lives and communities. It will not require advanced degrees of education, high-powered leadership structures, costly buildings, expensive advertising, salesmanship routines, light shows and Hollywood gimmicks. We won’t need experts to interpret Scripture for us, or to organize our discipleship programs and outreach events. It won’t be limited to a single day, or a particular event.

We’re just going to be the church, the body of Christ. Churchianity is dying, and we shouldn’t fight it. It’s on life support and is begging us to pull the plug. But as it fades away, I am beginning to see glimmers of light as the grime from centuries of tradition is scrubbed away, and the glory of God begins to manifest itself among groups of Christians who just want to live life like Jesus in their communities.

The newsletter includes a weekly blog digest
and the monthly newsletter with exclusive news and offers. This month's offer is a
free copy of my eBook
The Skeleton Church.


  • http://mypantstheatre.blogspot.com bullet

    Churchianity…

    I like that term; is it current or did you coin that?

    I think Churchianity may be what secularists are actually fighting, not Christianity. Not belief itself, but one belief to the exclusion of all others and the cult of belief (as in lifestyle) to that of society at large.

    I’ve always assumed that these mega-churches are either Baptist or Pentecostal, is that right?

  • http://www.texaschilly.blogspot.com Missy

    I’m in one of those new movements, you describe happening in the future, that started in the 70′s. We did almostly EXACTLY what you describe. Up until the last few years it was labeled a cult. Then we decided we wanted to fit in. :)

    We’re losing the cult label, but we’re also losing some of that closeness. We still got a lot of great things happening, but I see assimilation in our future.

    It seems like churches do what you describe rather frequently. It’s not new, just part of the cycle. Keeping it real.

  • http://www.tillhecomes.org Jeremy Myers

    Bullet,

    I don’t think I coined the term, but I don’t remember when/where I first heard it.

    You are right about what secularists are fighting. They (rightfully in my opinion) see some of the abuses of the church, and condemn them. Sadly, many throw out the baby with the bathwater and reject the whole thing.

    Regarding megachurches, they come in all flavors today. Most of them are probably Baptist or Pentecostal, but there are many which are non-denominational as well. And they are popping up all over the place since, to a large degree, creating a megachurch just takes marketing and money.

  • http://www.tillhecomes.org Jeremy Myers

    Missy,

    It’s true that this is just part of the cyle.

    If you don’t mind telling, what is the name of your church?

  • http://www.texaschilly.blogspot.com Missy

    Jeremy, I’m not sure what we’re called now, but we were the movement known as ICOC – Int’l Church of Christ. It was a movement torn from the Church of Christ – campus movement bent on changing the world, crying for change. Our big thing over the years has been the practice of discipleship.

    I’ve visited other ICOC churches across the country, and noticed those of us numbering less than 300 are most successful in living as a church like you’ve described. We get bigger, it falls apart. Smaller than 150, it gets overly controlling – this is where the “cult” rep comes from.

  • duke

    Peace be with you Jeremy, as well as those able to read this message.(if not censored)
    The time has come, the harvest is ripe.
    Make sure to share this with fellow believers.

    The Faithful Witness

Want to write a Guest Post while I move across the country? Get Published on this Blog