Name Calling Christians



I got called a name today by another Christian. I did not especially like it. I was called an agnostic.  I looked at him kind of weird when he said it, thinking he was joking. But he wasn’t. We have known each other for about two years, and though we agree on many basic doctrines of Christianity, we don’t agree on everything, and we definitely do not see eye to eye on some central Christian practices like baptism, the Lord’s Supper, and church attendance.

So today he called me an agnostic.

Given the context of our conversation, I was not sure he knew what the word meant, so I tried to get some clarification.  ”What do you mean?”  I asked.  ”Agnostics do not know whether or not God exists. Atheists believe God does not exist. Agnostics are open to the idea, but unsure. I believe God exists, so I am not an agnostic.”

But he persisted. He countered that even though I believed God existed, he held several beliefs about the attributes and actions of God about which I was uncertain. Therefore, in his mind I was an agnostic.

It’s odd, isn’t it, when we use our own beliefs to determine the orthodoxy of someone else?

Anyway, it soon became evident that I would not be able to convince him that I was not an agnostic. All I could do was chuckle to myself and walk away. If he wanted to call me an agnostic simply because I didn’t believe the same things he did with the same certainty, let him.

Later on, I realized that for him, agnostic  is probably equivalent to  unbeliever. If so, I guess that would also make me a backslider, and possibly even a heretic. He is probably praying for me right now to “return to the fold.”

Do you ever notice how many names we Christians like to call people? Adulterers, heathens, pagans, unbelievers, unchurched, the list goes on and on. (I wrote a post about this a while back.) I wonder if they dislike it as much as I disliked being labeled an agnostic. Maybe they don’t care. Maybe they don’t know.

But one thing is for sure, labeling others in such ways affects how we view and interact with them. So I propose a label that everyone can except. Let s stop the name calling, and just call people what they are. Let’s call them “people.”

The newsletter includes a weekly blog digest
and the monthly newsletter with exclusive news and offers. This month's offer is a
free copy of my eBook
The Skeleton Church.


  • http://www.abercrombie.cc bruce abercrombie

    Hi Jeremy, hope you & the fam are all doing well! Read with interest & some amusement your “Name-calling” post! Couple of thoughts struck me:
    1) While some “labelling” is pejorative; labelling is essential to communicating & comprehension.
    2) In your post you avoided “labeling” your acquaintance or friend (?) , but you did “label” him a “Christian®” and a “name-caller®”.
    3) Christ in His earthly ministry used descriptive labels in His discerning identification of “people”.
    did He not? ( Matthew 23.33; Luke 3.7, etc.)
    Love you “Jeremy”! Your “name-calling™ brother” In Christ®, bruce http://www.abercrombie.cc

    • http://www.tillhecomes.org Jeremy Myers

      Bruce,

      Ha ha! You’re right! I called him a “name caller.” And yes, Jesus did use labels, and did many other NT authors. Thanks for pointing all this out.

      I guess I’m not totally against labels, but maybe if someone objects to our use of a particular label, we should change it?

  • http://www.tillhecomes.org Jeremy Myers

    I’m reading a book right now called “Washed and Waiting” about gay Christians. He makes a good point that he uses the terms “gay” and “homosexual” as adjectives, not as nouns, as in “gay Christian” or “homosexual person.” Why? Because people are not identified first and foremost by what they believe or what they do. They are people first.

    What a person does or believes is part of who they are, but not all that they are.

  • FedExMOP

    Jeremy,

    I can really relate to this. Some friends of my family called us a few weeks ago with a request that we pray for the salvation of a mutual friend. We were a little shocked since we thought that this person (we’ll call her Lori) was already a believer. We discovered that during a discussion between our friend and Lori, they found that they did not believe the same things about heaven and hell, largely because Lori was raised in an athiest family in China and was a fairly recent believer in Christ. The sad part was that we were not able to convince our friend that Lori could posses eternal life if she did not agree with a list of “essential doctrines”.

    When training ministers I always teach them that determining a person’s status as a beliver or unbeliever is not possible and is almost alwayt counter productive. I teach that evangelism is living life as a relfection of Christ in such a way that we inspire those around us wither into a relationship with HIM or into a deeper relationship with HIM. It is amazing how much more effective and how more receptive people are to your message when you are not trying to judge their status before God.

    FedEx

    • http://www.tillhecomes.org Jeremy Myers

      That is right! We are not the judge of other people’s eternal destinies.

      Be careful trying to convince your friends about “Lori.” They may begin to think that you are unsaved also! Ha ha.

Want to write a Guest Post while I move across the country? Get Published on this Blog