The Different Types of Theology



Types of Theology

When discussing theology, we must be aware that there are different ways within Christianity of approaching and organizing theology. Here are the most common:

Natural Theology

Knowledge about God which is derived primarily from nature. Natural theology usually places a heavy emphasis on reason and philosophy.

Biblical Theology

Knowledge about God which is derived primarily from the Bible. The structure will often be arranged around major events of people of Scripture (e.g., Theology of Early Israel, Theology of the Prophets, Theology in Psalms, Theology of Paul, etc.).

Historical Theology

Knowledge about God which is derived from studying the development of ideas over time. The structure will often be arranged around the major periods of history which brought changes to theology (e.g., Theology of the Early Church, Theology of the Imperial Church, Theology of the Middle Ages, Theology of the Enlightenment and Reformation, etc.).

Systematic Theology

Knowledge about God which attempts to incorporate and combine all of the theological sources above. The structures is often arranged around major topics or categories of ideas which theologians have agreed upon over the centuries (e.g., Bibliology, Christology, Pneumatology, Ecclesialogy, Soteriology, etc.).

Dogmatic Theology

Knowledge about God which includes everything above, but with an emphasis on those teachings and ideas which have the authoritative stamp of approval from the church.

Practical Theology

Theology which is built upon any of the previous types of theology, but which emphasizes the practical ways of living out these ideas in our own lives today.

Studying Theology

What do you think?

You know what I find interesting? All of these types of thinking about theology are Western ways of thinking which stem primarily from Greek Philosophy and the Enlightenment. Cultures and religious systems which were not influenced as greatly by the Enlightenment did not develop “theology.”

Take Judaism for example. Jews don’t really study “theology.” Sure, they have thoughts and ideas about God, His Word, and His works, but they have never really attempted to arrange it in an orderly, systematized fashion. I have a few Jewish friends, and whenever I ask them if there is such a thing as an orderly arrangement of Jewish beliefs, they look at me like I am speaking another language. They don’t even understand the question. Why? Because they are not as concerned with what you believe, as with what you do. Judaism is not a system of beliefs, but a system of behavior. While Christians believe that right belief leads to right actions, Jewish people believe that right action leads to right belief. So if you ask them for a book which contains an orderly arrangement of Jewish actions, they have thousands.

In speaking with a Jewish Rabbi about this very thing today (to make sure I got it right), he said this:

When you were growing up, how did you know your mother loved you? Was it just something you believed, or was it something you saw by her behavior? And when you wanted to show her you loved her in return, did you just believe that you loved her, or did you do something to show it?

I see his point, but it seems that the emphasis on right action can lead to lead to legalism and an emphasis on outward behavior rather than the inner attitude of hearth, something Jesus and the Prophets frequently criticized.

So what do you think? Is our orderly arrangement of theology by ideas rather than by actions a strength or a weakness in Christian theology?


The newsletter includes a weekly blog digest
and the monthly newsletter with exclusive news and offers. This month's offer is a
free copy of my eBook
The Skeleton Church.


  • http://www.lifeofasteward.com Loren Pinilis

    I would say that right belief precedes right action, and I feel that’s pretty important to the Christian life (as long as one rightly understand what belief is and doesn’t confuse it with raw emotion).
    However, I would say that an orderly arrangement of ideas isn’t necessarily essential. It’s helpful for us in processing the Bible, but I think that sometimes we put too much emphasis on the order of it all. Right theology is often more of a web than a ladder. To be thorough, systematic theologies will use all sorts of footnotes and references to other areas yet to come.

    • http://www.tillhecomes.org Jeremy Myers

      Loren,
      I think I agree with you. I would put belief before actions, but actions can help “tweak” and adjust our beliefs. They are kind of cyclical, I think.

      I also agree with you about the Bible. If we really believe that God wrote it as He wanted it, then why do we cut it all up and rearrange it into neat little packages that better fit our idea of what is “orderly.” Great point you made.

    • http://www.tillhecomes.org Jeremy Myers

      Elias,
      I was wondering if someone was going to bring up James 2. It is a tricky passage. A professor of mine, John Hart, pointed out that we can help make sense of the passage more if we translate “dead” as “useless” and understand works as what energizes faith. I think that was what he said anyway. I would have to go check my notes. Eventually, as I work my way through my notes, I imagine I will get to them….

    • http://www.mopcolorado.blogspot.com FedExMOP

      Elias,

      I would agree with you on James 2, but only if you narrow the scope of your soteriology to recieving or possessing eternal life. I do think, however, that since soterios and sozo (translated salvation and saved) are very commonly used to refer to life after recieving eternal life, limiting your soteriology only to possessing eternal life misses much of the biblical intent.

      I would say that James is soteriological in that our salvation is not only saved from an eternal destiny of hell, but that our salvation is also from the present power and consequence of sin in the here and now. James is speaking of being saved, but not about getting into heaven. The fact is that soterios is rarely used to denote in or out of heaven. James, I believe, is pointing out that our salvation is not just about our future eternal destiny, but also about deliverance from sin here and now.

      Just for the record, I am also a fan of Hodges and consider myself “free grace”. I just believe that we should be careful in limiting our use of salvation and saved to a more narrow definition than the scriptures would support.

      FedEx,
      President,
      Men of Praise Ministry

  • http://www.mopcolorado.blogspot.com FedExMOP

    Elias,

    I was raised a legalist in a very legalistic church, and I excelled at it. I lived more than twenty years of the Christian life believing that my performance made me acceptable to God in some way. Through a long painful process, God stripped away the legalism and brought me into an understanding of his wonderful love and grace.

    I once thought that I knew what the Christian life was supposed to look like. I could accept people who were messy as long as there was some evidence that they were looking to clean themselves up and look like “good Christians”. Now, some of the Godliest men I know have long hair, wear leather(even to church), and skip church to hang out with outlaw motorcycle gangs. And they have no desire to change, they are reveling in who they are and how God made them and reaching out to those who could not be reached by someone who looked like a “good Christian” in my old view.

    I still have much to learn about Grace, as well as what God desires of His children after recieving eternal life. Thank you for your response.

    FedEx,
    President,
    Men of Praise Ministry

  • http://www.mopcolorado.blogspot.com FedExMOP

    Wow, a messianic jew and a free-gracer, you truly are a rare breed. God’s blessings to you as well my brother.

    FedEx,
    President,
    Men of Praise Motorcycle Ministry

  • TARIKU ENDALE

    you are on the way that mostly is necessary to the Christians.

    • TARIKU ENDALE

      good Go ahead to preach the gospel of the God still

  • Greg D

    I believe in a healthy dose of both. I think right behavior can help shape our right actions. But, I have found the more action I partake in, it has helped reshape my theology. At first, I was all about right behavior until I began serving people on the mission field. This changed everything when I discovered that it’s not about right behavior and even right beliefs, but more about reflecting and expressing the love of Christ to others by loving them and serving them just as Christ would.

Want to write a Guest Post while I move across the country? Get Published on this Blog