Archive - Theology RSS Feed

Revoke your Tax-Exempt Status


In the United States, churches do not have to pay property taxes. This is a great benefit to churches, especially when church budgets are tight.

But have you ever wondered why churches are given tax-exempt status? It has nothing to do with the separation of church and state. The reason churches are given tax-exempt status is the same reason that any other non-profit organization (whether religious or not) is given the same status: they engage in charitable work that benefits the community. The government wants to encourage people to be charitable, and so gives tax-exempt status to charitable organizations.

Therefore, if a church is not engaging in charitable service in the community, it is reasonable to ask them to surrender their tax-exempt status. Churches, like any charitable organization, should only get tax-excempt status if they can show where and how they are providing a service to the community.

“But,” a church might say, “We cannot afford to do much in the community. We are barely paying our bills as it is.”

Continue Reading…

Redeem your Church Building


In numerous previous posts, I have proposed that churches sell their building in order to live according to kingdom principles and become more missional.

Maybe you are not convinced.

Or maybe you cannot imagine doing church without owning a building. Maybe you truly do need to own a building to carry out your God-given mission in your community. There are many churches around the world that own buildings and use them for the Kingdom to the glory of God. Maybe yours is one of them, and selling your building might actually interfere with your mission in the world.

Fine.

I am not against buildings per se. I do not believe that owning a church building is necessarily sinful or wrong. Buildings are a tool, and can either help or hinder the mission of the church. There are many cases where buildings can be used effectively.

My primary concern is that for many churches, buildings are chains that hold the people back from truly ministering in an effective way in the community. With buildings come footholds of power, money, and control that hold many congregations back.

Continue Reading…

God Does Not Rape


God does not rape. He woos.Rachel Held Evans has a great guest post today from Elizabeth Esther about the will of God and the will of humans. She writes this:

It wasn’t until recently when I was reading about the persecution of Romanian Christians under Communist rule that something changed for me. According to the late Patriarch Theoctist of the Romanian Orthodox Church, “Man has a very powerful will—so powerful that even God Himself does not break it. And by this [God] is actually showing that man is in the likeness of God. Without man’s will he could not make any progress on the way to goodness. So out of all the gifts that God grants the human being, we believe that freedom is one of the most important.” (Mysteries of the Jesus Prayer, p.126).

The entire post is great, and I encourage you to go read the rest.

While I used to believe that God forced His will upon us, it one day occurred to me that this was similar to rape. Even if it was out of His love for us, love (by definition) cannot be forced upon someone else. It can only be freely offered and freely received.

How does God win us over? The same way a man wins over a woman – through wooing, kindness, generosity, acts of love, tender words, service, self-sacrifice, priceless gifts, and sometimes, feats of strength. Yes, God is a show off. If you don’t believe me, have you watched a stunning sun set recently? Have you looked at a snowflake? Have you studied a tree?

No, God does not rape. He woos.

Sell Your Church Building


sell your church buildingAs we look at ways to help churches become more missional and organic, we have been discussing the problems of church buildings and the inherent restrictions they cause.

One solution is simply to sell your church building.

If your church has more than 20 people, you probably feel that selling your building is not an option. It may be fine for a church of a dozen people to meet in someone’s house, but that is unrealistic for a church of 50 or 100, let alone a church of 1000 or more.

But if a church really wants to escape the pitfalls of power and control that come with buildings, there are only two options: you must either sell the building or find another way to break free of the issues and pitfalls of owning a building.

In this post, we will look at how your church could still function if you decide to sell it. In a laster post, we will survey some suggestions for redeeming your building if you retain it.

Continue Reading…

Church, Ekklesia, Kuriakon, or Circus?


Alan Knox writes great posts about the church. He recently wrote two posts (Post 1 and Post 2) about the definition of church, and here is an excerpt from one of them:

Unfortunately, because of the many definitions of the modern term “church,” the meaning of the word when we read it in the New Testament is often muddled. Some of that ambiguity has arisen because the English term “church” did not originate from the Greek term ekklesia that it translates in the New Testament. (For more information, see my post “The ekklesia and the kuriakon.”)

The Greek term ekklesia did not and could not carry all of the definitions of the English term “church.” Instead, the term ekklesia always referred to an assembly of people. (For more information, see my posts “The ekklesia of Josephus” and “The ekklesia in context.”) In the instances that interest me, the term ekklesia refer to an assembly of God’s people.

In some cases, the term ekklesia refers to all of God’s people which he has “assembled” or “gathered” out of the world. In other cases – most cases – the term refers to actual gatherings of God’s people, often designated by geography or location. Interestingly, in this latter case, the term ekklesia does seem to refer to subset of a larger ekklesia (i.e. the “church” in someone’s house as a subset of the “church” in a city). However, these subsets are never set against one another; they remain part of the larger ekklesia.

I have written some about this myself (Post 1 and Post 2), and noted the following:

It is important to note that “church” is not exactly a translation of the Greek ekklēsia. The term “church” actually is derived from the German Kirche, which in turn comes from the Greek adjective kuriakon, “belonging to the Lord” (cf. 1 Cor 11:20) or possibly the Latin circus. In the early history of the church, when the New Testament was getting translated from Greek into Latin, there was no clear equivalent in Latin for ekklēsia, and so various terms were proposed. Tertullian used curia (“court”) while Augustine famously wrote of the Civitas Dei (“City of God”).

One surprisingly common term used by various Greek writers was thiasos (“party”), which generally referred to a troop of revelers marching through the city streets with dance and song, often in honor of Bacchus, the god of drunkenness. The point is that many early writers did not know how to translate or describe the term ekklēsia, but the terms they proposed offer tantalizing clues as to how the church functioned and was viewed during its early years.

Are you glad that our Latin forefathers went with “church” or would have preferred one of the others: court, party, City of God, or maybe even Circus? Sometimes I think church is a circus.

Maybe as the church goes through upheavals in modern times, we should search for a new term. Rather than qualifying the term “church” (as in Institutional Church, House Church, Simple Church, Missional Church, Organic Church), we should just use a different word altogether.

I have written more on this in my book, Skeleton Church. Get your copy today!


Want to write a Guest Post while I move across the country? Get Published on this Blog