How to Kill the Church



How to Kill the Church

Despite the fact that Christians create creeds to protect the church, creeds and confessions often have the opposite result. Creeds kill the church. They are a bullet to the brain of church creativity and unity.crea

Creeds Kill Creativity in the Church

We kill the creativity and liberty of others by scaring them into conforming to our creeds and doctrinal statements. Some of the best exegetical and theological work that has ever been done in the history of the church was done in the early centuries of the church before there were all the creeds and confessions to rein people in. Origen, for example, may have been one of the most creative Bible scholars the church has ever seen, and he came up with some great interpretations of Biblical texts. But he also came up with outlandish ideas, which were later condemned as heresy by the church. As a result, people barely study Origen, because they are afraid of being outcast for reading and studying a “heretic.”

Similarly today, Pastors and professors who develop a fresh way of understanding a biblical text are often afraid to share it with others, due to the theological backlash they are sure to receive. Bible College and Seminary students want to graduate, and so they also are discouraged from researching in new directions, and challenging the status quo in the understanding of some biblical texts. The doctrinal statement of the school restrains their desire to learn, study, and think for themselves.

Creeds Kill Church Unity

Creeds kill church unity One final way that creeds kill is in the area of church unity. And unity, according to Jesus, is one of the key ways that the church is to be recognized. Our lack of unity kills the church. Though creeds and confessions were intended to bring people together over core elements of the faith, what actually happens is that the statements separates one group within the body of Christ from another. The doctrinal differences are usually not that large, but they are significant enough to bring division and strife within the church.

I think it saddens Jesus when there are dozens of groups of believers within the same town who are separated by a minor point of theology and so cannot love and serve others in the community. When arguments about when Jesus will return or whether or not people can speak in tongues today keep us from working together for the gospel, our creeds have killed the church.

In spite of the fact that the original Reformers—particularly Luther—began the movement with a liberating rediscovery of free grace and dying love, their successors…rapidly obscured that liberty by scholasticizing the stuffing out of it. Every church of the Reformation era (the Roman Church not excepted) fell in love with the idea of confecting long-winded confessions of faith—binding documents that spelled out in mind-numbing detail the correct positions to be held on all points at issue (Robert Farrar Capon in The Astonished Heart).

The new ideas of the Reformation which initially reinvigorated the church, soon killed the church when people tried to codify, define, and defend all the new ideas with ever-lengthening doctrinal statements. In the end, the problem was just as bad as before: the creeds and confessions of the church caused us to completely miss the entire point of the Gospel and the teaching of Jesus.


The newsletter includes a weekly blog digest
and the monthly newsletter with exclusive news and offers. This month's offer is a
free copy of my eBook
The Skeleton Church.


  • http://www.abnormalreaction.wordpress.com Swanny

    Creed is Christ Greed.

    If you want to be with Christ.. follow our creeds. He is with us, not you.

    • http://www.tillhecomes.org Jeremy Myers

      Interesting idea. So the development of creeds is us trying to control what others think about Christ?

      • http://antwrites.com Ant Writes

        I would have to agree!

  • http://www.anotherjohn.com John

    I am going to let your opinion soak in a bit. However, creeds, I think, remind us; they don’t kill us. They remind us of who we are and who we are committing ourselves to be.

    When we confess, for example, that “we believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life,” we are reminding ourselves that God brings, gives and is life. We, in turn, are to live as a reflection of God’s life-giving grace and love.

    Thanks for the thought. Stay blessed…john

    • http://www.tillhecomes.org Jeremy Myers

      John,

      This part of the series on creeds is pointing out some of the negative aspects. Eventually, I will get to the positive aspects, and I think you have hit on one. Creeds can help remind us of the truths of Scripture, and what is important.

      But creeds are not always (nor often) used for that purpose, but seem instead to be used to control and condemn others.

      • http://www.anotherjohn.com John

        Thank you. I happened to Stumble upon the site and did not realize you were in a series. Oops.

        In that light, I agree.

        Stay blessed…john

  • http://lslrl.blogspot.com Dan B.

    I had breakfast Sunday with a friend who is Lutheran. He brought up communion and a couple other issues we don’t agree on doctrinally. And then he got into infant baptism and I started to challenge him on that one. We started to get into a back and forth on it and when I realized we are on the verge of an argument I took a breath and said that when we get to heaven, there are going to be a lot of people who we disagree with on doctrine. Catholics, charismatics, Lutherans, emergents/emergings, maybe even some Mormons or Jehovah Witnesses or other members of cults whose doctrines have flown over their heads and who simply trust in Jesus. And so why do we let doctrinal/creed differences separate us.

    • http://www.tillhecomes.org Jeremy Myers

      What did he say in return?

      • http://lslrl.blogspot.com Dan B.

        Oh, he agreed. Our friendship remains in tact. :)

        • http://antwrites.com Ant Writes

          That reminds me of a fellow I know who memorized the minor catechism, and always used it debates! He treats Luther’s Catechism as a perfect inspired writing, without error. I’m pretty sure he’s not the only Lutheran who believes that. And to comment on the other poster, I bet Stephen will be shocked when he sees Paul!

  • http://www.truth-makes-freedom.blogspot.com/ Katherine Gunn

    Hmm….just thinking….it seems that it often comes down to who (or what) we place our faith in.

    When we begin to follow a person and their revelation, never seeking personal revelation, we begin to deify their words – their writings – their beliefs. Statements of faith are not necessarily evil. It is when the statement becomes god to us – when we follow a statement rather than Christ, that the statement becomes a weapon.

    Unfortunately, too often, the easy route is to just follow what someone else tells us to do rather than seeking for ourselves. It is easier to give someone else the power and responsibility of telling us what to do and not do…”just tell me what to do and I’ll do it”…than to pursue a true daily relationship with God ourselves.

    The first only requires of us external behavioral things that can be faked, without having to truly address our internal stuff. The latter requires being honest with ourselves and God – acknowledging our brokenness.

    Paradoxically, the first creates an atmosphere of fear – if someone challenges my doctrine, they’re challenging my perceived position with God – my sense of security; while the second creates a state of not caring so much about others individual beliefs as just being real with God.

    In my experience, those who pursue the latter seem to scare the crap out of the ones who pursue the former….

    • http://www.tillhecomes.org Jeremy Myers

      Great insight. We do often deify the doctrinal statement, which is why we feel threatened when people disagree with it.

  • Kirk

    The only “creed” that really matters is John 3:16.

    • http://www.tillhecomes.org Jeremy Myers

      That’s a good one!

      But if I could play “devil’s advocate” (maybe I should say “creedal advocate”?), John 3:16 doesn’t name who the “begotten Son” is, why we will perish if we don’t believe, or a variety of other things that most creeds spell out in some detail.

      • http://www.truth-makes-freedom.blogspot.com/ Katherine Gunn

        I often think of the thief on the cross. He seems to defy every doctrinal statement I’ve ever read. :-)

        • Kirk

          The thief on the cross had plenty of time to get baptized and turn from his sins and do his hail Mary’s while eating some crackers and grape juice as he read the KJV Bible! get your facts straight!

          • http://www.truth-makes-freedom.blogspot.com/ Katherine Gunn

            Hmm….isn’t it so sad that everyone prior to 1611 (when KJV was written) never had the chance to read the bible properly….;-)

      • Kirk

        ah you have a point. But you get what I mean lol
        Faith alone in Jesus alone for eternal life = only way.

        • http://www.tillhecomes.org Jeremy Myers

          Yes, I understand and agree.

  • http://www.diggingtheword.blogspot.com/ Rick Morgan

    If we could just get along we wouldn’t “need” a thousand different churches in a metro area. We could spend God’s money on his work instead of bills for all of the separate facilities.

    • http://www.tillhecomes.org Jeremy Myers

      So true, Rick!

Want to write a Guest Post while I move across the country? Get Published on this Blog